Untitled Document
In this Issue
Capacity Building in Post-conflict Countries in Africa: A Summary of Lessons of Experience from Mozambique, Rwanda, Sierra Leone & Uganda
ACBF Secretariat Activities
Outreach and Networking
   Previous Issues
 - Archives
 
To the reader

ACBF Newsletter aims at providing news and facilitating the exchange of ideas of ACBF’s capacity-building interventions in Africa. The intention is to share current experiences, concepts and methodological approaches; encourage adoption of best practices; and promote a culture of informed and participatory development
management in Africa.

Your comments and views are most welcome.

Happy reading!

ISSN 1684-6079
Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the official position of ACBF or its sponsors.
   
  Volume 1. No.4, Quarterly Newsletter, Published in English and French      Fourth Quarter 2004
 
 
 
FROM THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Meeting the Challenge of Enhancing Investment
for Poverty Reduction in Africa

Recent Statistical evidence is consistent that overall economic performance in Africa is on a positive trend, as a result of growing improvements in the policy and governance environment. Africa needs sustained growth rates of about 7%-8% to make a visible impact on poverty – the most intractable problem facing the African continent. The achievement of this desired growth rate requires a much higher level of investment, increased intra-Africa and external trade flows, and a more efficient use of resources. Trade and investment are thus two vital complementary elements in any credible strategy to accelerate Africa’s development, enhance the rate of economic growth, and sustain progress towards the eventual eradication of poverty.

  • Investment

The desired growth rate required in Africa needs a sustained high rate of investment in excess of 30%. Domestic savings and foreign direct investment (FDI) will need to play a more prominent role in the financing of the investment requirements. Relative to official development assistance (ODA), FDI offers a more convenient resource base and brings to a country new technologies; new high-value products; more efficient production processes; more effective management techniques; and access to important global export markets. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has estimated that about two-thirds of world trade flows through multi-national corporations, which control a sizeable flow of FDI. Quite unfortunately, Africa is not a significant beneficiary of FDI - about 1.7% of global FDI inflows in 2002. On average, Africa’s share of developing countries’ inflows has suffered more than 50% reduction since the mid 1980s (from 12% in 1985 to 5% in 2002). At the same time, the share of Asia in world trade is much higher and has been increasing over the years (from 17.9% of world exports in 1980 to about 23% in 2002; from about 13.1% of world imports in 1980 to about 20.8% in 2002). Asian countries have seen their outward FDI stock grow rapidly from about 2% in 1990 to about 9% in 2001.

Sustaining high investment rates is a monumental challenge for the African continent, given that gross domestic investment as a proportion of gross domestic product is below 20%. Boosting investment requires stable and responsive macro and sectoral policies and programs, good governance, a sizeable market for investments requiring appreciable economies of scale, enhancement of international competitiveness through improved infrastructure, better information on the continent, enhanced public-private sector partnership for more efficient use of resources, a propitious policy environment for private sector development, deregulation of domestic markets, development and maintenance of adequate legal, judicial and regulatory frameworks and reasonable reduction of trade barriers, among other factors. Although there is appreciable progress in meeting these requirements in most African countries, a great deal remains to be done.

  • Trade

Trade is vital for African countries, as export earnings are essentially the most important form of external resource inflows. The continent’s share of world trade has not only declined in absolute terms, but also by product mix. For instance, Africa was once the most important producer of copper alloys, accounting for about 32% of all Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) imports during the period 1962-1964. By the first half of the 1990s, specifically 1991-1993, the continent’s share had plummeted by 22 percentage points to about 10%. This has translated into significant trade losses for the continent, estimated at about US$11.0 billion annually.
The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act of the U.S. Administration, which stresses trade and private sector investment, is an example, among other promising bilateral interventions, that recognizes the importance of trade and investment for Africa’s future.

In contrast, OECD official development assistance received by Africa in 1991 was $10.9 billion. Current statistics show that Africa’s share in world trade has been falling since 1980 (from about 6.0% of world exports in 1980 to 2.0% in 2002; from about 4.6% of world imports in 1980 to about 2.1% in 2002).

What is therefore obvious is that, like investment flows, Africa’s trade performance is grossly inadequate. The continent’s unsatisfactory performance in trade can be attributed to a number of factors, prominent among which are:

  • Protectionism in the markets of the industrialized countries. This is being compounded in the OECD countries by the strong growth of regionalism, which has had severe impact on African exports competing with those from countries that are members of regional arrangements with free-trade access. Regional trade arrangements in the OECD include the European Union (EU), the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), and the North American Free Trade Areas (NAFTA);
  • Export subsidies, especially farm subsidies by industrialized countries;
  • Inappropriate domestic policies;
  • Uncoordinated and inadequately sequenced trade liberalization programs not accompanied by requisite policy measures and programs;
  • Policies constraining private sector development;
  • High transport costs ;
  • Poor infrastructure – electricity, water supplies, telecommunications, transportation networks and facilities, etc.;
  • Bureaucratic red tape and high transaction costs;
  • Political instability;
  • Inadequate supply response capacity;
  • Inadequate access to trade information and weak negotiations skills of private and private sector officials in charge of trade policy;
  • Lack of integration of trade and investment policies into countries’ overall development policies and programs; and
  • Insufficient regional cooperation and integration.
  • Meeting Challenges

Lessons of development experience over the last thirty years encouragingly point to potential opportunities and benefits for developing countries with liberalized economies. Open and liberal trade regimes have placed a number of developing countries at vantage positions to gain access to newer, more appropriate technologies, while financial liberalization has increased their access to international private capital, permitting them to achieve much higher rates of investment and growth.

The ongoing policy reforms and capacity building initiatives that support the foregoing areas of intervention need to be strengthened, scaled up and sustained. All this requires concerted efforts by all stakeholders in Africa’s development process, particularly more resources to meet the capacity needs.

Given the compelling need to increase investment, African countries are making greater efforts to raise domestic savings rates and mobilize private capital. They are making progress towards meeting the aforementioned trade and investment-retarding challenges through appropriate policies. The policies for strengthening domestic savings include pursuing macroeconomic stability through appropriate, market-determined interest and exchange rates, prudent fiscal policies, and reform of domestic financial systems. The perceived riskiness of investment on the continent is being addressed through a number of reforms and programs including:

(i) legal reforms to simplify commercial jurisprudence and improve the functioning of the courts, enforce contracts fairly and impartially, and protect property rights;
(ii) regulatory reforms that provide an efficient structure of incentives;

(iii) targeted government spending, which ensures that the necessary human capital and physical infrastructure are created and extended; and

(iv) consistent, credible policy formulation processes that minimize the likelihood of policy reversals and maximize its predictability. To ensure the successful implementation of these policies, greater attention is being given to civil service reforms and capacity building – areas in which considerable success has been achieved in recent years. Significant progress has also been made in the area of regional integration and political governance reforms to, respectively, strengthen economies of scale and reduce political risks to investment

The need to enhance public sector effectiveness and facilitate private sector development in African countries is itself being addressed by means of administrative reforms and programs that are improving the effectiveness and efficiency of public service delivery, raising professional standards, and actively promoting ethical behavior by public servants; and by a clear commitment to transparency and accountability in the management of public resources.

AFRICA’S SHARE OF WORLD TRADE
AND INVESTMENT:
SOME FACTS AND FIGURES
  • Africa’s share in world exports declined from 3.5% in 1970 to 1.5% in 1999
  • This loss was equivalent to US$70 billion per annum, about 5 times the level of ODA
  • Africa’s exports are still concentrated on natural resource-based products, unlike the situation in most other developing regions.
  • Unfavorable export prices since 1970 have offset the increase in ODA for many African countries.
  • Since 1997, the prices of non-oil commodity exports have fallen by about 35%
  • Trade barriers (including excessively demanding standards, which de facto constitute non-tariff barrier) and subsidies are the major constraints to Africa’s export growth.
Farm subsidies in G8 countries – about US$310billion per year – equals 23 times aid flows to Africa

 

  • The Need for Commensurate Response

The reforms and programs being undertaken by African countries constitute pointed responses to the challenge of boosting trade and investment on the continent, and their outcomes are promising. Given the efforts made thus far to sustain these reforms, Africa needs effective and commensurate support by the international community. The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act of the U.S. Administration, which stresses trade and private sector investment, is an example, among other promising bilateral interventions, that recognizes the importance of trade and investment for Africa’s future.

Industrial countries, however, need to do considerably more to ensure fairer trade practices by providing open access to their markets, and supporting efforts to improve administrative efficiency, combat corruption, and promote transparency in African countries. An important aspect to the desired response by the industrialized countries is the removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers to imports of goods in which African countries have comparative advantage, substantial reduction in agricultural subsidies, and assistance to African countries through financial and technical resources to mitigate some of the short to medium-term adverse consequences of subsidies on African economies. Financial and capacity building support for the ongoing trade policy reform processes can also contribute to maintaining the momentum for trade reform on the continent. On this score, I would like to note that the Foundation’s trade-related interventions (ACBF-supported policy units contribute professional policy research and advice to the analysis of trade and investment issues and the design of trade policies and programs) are strengthening capacity for the development and implementation of reforms necessary to improve Africa’s share in world trade and investment flows.

The Foundation’s interventions through national, regional and continent-wide projects and programs to strengthen public sector reforms and build policy analysis capacity, the regional economic communities (CEMAC, COMESA, ECOWAS, etc) and other regional initiatives like Projet pour le Renforcement de l’Interface entre les Etats et Chambres d’Agriculture de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (PRIECA/AO), as well as NEPAD’s trade policy initiative are helping to strengthen human and institutional capacity required by countries and regional organizations to undertake the following, among others:

  • Improve the quality of macroeconomic policy framework
  • Reform public sectors and streamline bureaucratic procedures to facilitate the growth and development of the private sector in the capital cities, as well as in urban and rural areas
  • Accelerate the process of regional integration
  • Strengthen trade negotiations capacity
  • Design and effectively implement export-oriented development strategies in an environmentally-friendly manner
  • Pursue reasonably liberalized trade policies
  • Design and implement optimal tax policies to support private sector investment and promote public-private sector partnerships
  • Develop financial systems and instruments for export growth and diversification
  • Modernize and diversify productive sectors to improve supply response capacities
  • Promote greater efficiency and productivity among local producers
  • Strengthen international competitiveness of national economies
  • Undertake better analysis of current and prospective export markets
    Improve transport, tele-communications, power supply and related infrastructure.

The ongoing policy reforms and capacity building initiatives that support the foregoing areas of intervention need to be strengthened, scaled up and sustained. All this requires concerted efforts by all stakeholders in Africa’s development process, particularly more resources to meet the capacity needs.


Conclusion

In conclusion, it cannot be overemphasized that trade and investment hold the key to the level of growth required by Africa to effectively take on the challenge of reducing extreme poverty. Capacity building support by the Foundation and other development partners to boost trade and investment holds considerable promise for African countries to stay the course of ongoing reforms and programs.
Elements of this support were once again echoed at various workshops held towards the end of 2004 (ACBF-UNCTAD workshop on Trade, Investment and Capacity Building, November 4-5, 2004 and IMF-UK-OECD Informal Meeting on Trade Capacity Building Workshops, December 3, 2004). What is now required are commensurate policy and program reforms by industrial countries to strengthen the expansion of trade and investment so as to accelerate the development process and scale up poverty reduction efforts in Africa.

 


References: www.worldbank.org - Expanding Africa’s trade and Investment; “Fostering Trade and Investment – A Vehicle for Accelerating Africa’s Integration into the Global Economy – Address by Deputy Managing Director, IMF, 25 March 1999. “Promoting Trade and Investment to Accelerate Africa’s Development – Reference document for 18th Meeting of Tepcow, Addis Ababa, 29 April 1997.