|
|
Private
Sector Development and Gender Promotion Nexus: A Reflection
|
| |
 |
Mrs. Leah Chatta-Chipepa,
ACBF Program Officer, Zone III |
Based on the understanding that
reducing gender-based and other socio-economic
inequalities can lead to the expansion of economic
opportunities and sustainable growth, how can
efforts to
stimulate private sector development be advanced
to promote gender equality Reports on the
assessment of progress made in the implementation
of
international instruments and commitments of
gender equality, equity and womens empowerment
identify different stakeholders in the promotion
of gender issues.
In addition, these reports propose a programme
of action to accelerate further implementation
of commitments. These actions include capacity
building
initiatives, legal reform, enabling policy
environments, gender awareness, and womens
targeted interventions.
However, while stakeholders such as government ministries and agencies, capacity
building institutions, funding agencies, womens/gender organizations, think
tanks, and academia efforts and actions are highlighted, little or no mention is
made of the efforts and role of the private sector in the promotion of gender
equality. Government and non-governmental reports do not mainstream private
sector initiatives in reports tracking gender equality promotion. This scenario
de-links private sector participation and collaboration with other actors in the
struggle for eliminating gender disparities. Creating interface between state,
civil society and the private sector in the promotion in gender issues is
critical in order to promote policy dialogue that will contribute to the
reduction of disparities between women and men, girls and boys.
Interface for policy dialogue is an effective way for different actors to engage
with each other. Engagement begins with dialogue. With regard to the public
sector, gender advocacy groups have traditionally been excluded from
decision-making processes and thus do not understand the processes and rules of
engagement. In addition , since womens participation is assumed despite the
fact that the environment may be hostile to their involvement, both parties need
to know and understand the rules of engagement to initiate dialogue.
Women and men face different social and economic constraints in responding to
economic opportunities in the private sector. In general, these constraints
relate to women lacking education and appropriate training, and having less
access to and control over collateral, capital, and financial markets. Women
also have greater household and child care responsibilities. Taxation laws and
regulations may include discriminatory provisions against women, while attitudes
and beliefs may put up barriers to womens opportunities in the private sector.
By recognizing and addressing These inefficiencies in the market and the social
system to ensure womens equal participation in private sector development can
be recognized and addressed through policy dialogue interface capacity building
projects.
Consequently, the support to tripartite capacity building programs involving the
public and private sectors, and gender advocacy groups will go a long way to
mainstreaming the three sectors in promoting gender equality and ensuring the
tracking of progress and actions to reduce gender disparities. While
women-specific organizations and networks continue to play an important role in
promoting womens empowerment and gender equality, it is critical that they are
equally represented in both public and private sectors with relevant gender
perspectives forming an integral part of the sectors programs. Building the
capacity of womens groups, the private and public sectors in the rules of
engagement that include skills and knowledge in research and policy analysis;
networking and information dissemination; negotiation; lobbying; and, advocacy
would promote greater synergy and harmony in advancing the gender agenda. The
private sector should thus become part and parcel of the efforts promoting
gender equality through interface capacity building interventions that strive to
improve stakeholder engagement and participation in policy dialogue. |
|
|