The
African Forum for Utility Regulators
holds its 6th Annual Conference and
General Assembly under the theme: Pro-Poor
Regulation: Meeting the Millennium
Development Goals for Infrastructure
Services in Africa
Côte d'Ivoire – 22 –24
April, 2009
 |
Group photo
following the Opening Session |
On
22–24 April 2009, the African
Forum for Utility Regulators (AFUR)
held its 6th Annual Conference and
General Assembly in Abidjan, Côte
d’Ivoire. An ACBF delegation
comprising Dr. Edwin Forlemu (Executive
Secretary a.i) and Dr. Samba Ka (Manager,
Operations Department III), attended
the event. Dr. Kerfalla Yansane, Chair
of the Operations Committee of the
ACBF Executive Board, served as Special
Advisor to AFUR and Convenor of the
Forum.
AFUR was officially launched in November
2002 in Pretoria, South Africa. Its
activities concentrate on the regulation
of energy, communications, transport,
water and sanitation, including cross-sectoral
issues that are not necessarily limited
to the priority sectors. The mission
of AFUR is to promote an effective
regulatory system, which would facilitate
the development of infrastructure services
in Africa. AFUR seeks to facilitate
the sharing of information, lessons,
and experiences, harmonization of regulatory
frameworks, and to support capacity-building
efforts relating to the priority areas.
The theme of the 6th Annual Conference
and General Assembly was “Pro-Poor
Regulation: Meeting the Millennium
Development Goals for Infrastructure
Services in Africa”. The theme
sought to: (i) facilitate information
and experience sharing and the application
of common and consistent decision making
practices and procedures among regulators;
and (ii) introduce the need for capacity
building among members through skills
training and the development of regulatory
staff.
The conference theme
addressed seven core issues, which
included:
- Infrastructure privatisation:
What are the lessons for the
poor, and for
the future?
- Are the poor a problem or an
opportunity for business? Are
the poor too poor
to pay for services?
- Pro-poor regulation: What
role for the consumers?
- Pro-poor regulation: Subsidies
or cross subsidies
- Pro-poor regulation: What
obligations and what incentives
for private companies?
- Infrastructure services
decentralized: Challenges
and lessons for poverty
reduction policies
- Efficiency and Equity
trade-offs: What role
for development partners?
 |
Edwin N.
Forlemu, ACBF Executive Secretary
a.i., presenting his opening
remarks at the Conference
|
Speaking
at the opening ceremony on 22 April
2009, Edwin N. Forlemu, Executive Secretary
a.i. of ACBF declared, “Gone
are the days when public-utility regulation
was driven by the overarching notion
that public utilities should be organized
and run as public monopolies, indeed
as nationalized entities. We know what
happened to those utilities. Gone too
are the days when it was assumed that
private ownership would yield cost-effective
services to the poor. It became clear
that, because utilities too can be
public goods, markets do fail. We also
know what happened to those utilities.
This is why we are talking increasingly
today about a more pragmatic reform
agenda – the approach to public-private
partnerships in infrastructure regulation.
We therefore need to do more to clarify
this new framework and make it work
for the poor through better access,
more affordability, and greater corporate
social responsibility”. Dr.
Forlemu indicated that three key requirements
need to be met to take forward innovative
initiatives in utility regulation:
vision, leadership, and capacity building.
There is need to develop African leaders
and institutions of tomorrow in the
area of utility regulation in order
to enhance the effectiveness of service
delivery to the public. Such leadership
should be able to articulate, disseminate
and execute the vision through the
development and implementation of cutting-edge
utility regulation and policies that
improve the lives of the people. Efforts
should also be invested in building
capacity through systematic and coherent
rule making, institution building,
training, research, partnerships, networking
and advocacy so that utility regulation
reform may have a sustainable impact.
Dr. Forlemu chaired the session on “Pro-poor
Regulation: What Role for the Consumers?” Drawing
on the key challenges facing regulatory
bodies and the consumer movement, the
main presentation of the session delineated
the key areas in which the role of
consumer organizations would be critical:
(i) advisory services; (ii) information,
education and representation; (iii)
poverty mapping; (iv) choice of the
appropriate infrastructure technology;
(v) monitoring of the effectiveness
of regulatory decisions; (vi) assessment
of contracts and licenses, as well
as approval of the annual revenue for
operators; and (vii) pro-poor awareness
campaigns.
Dr. Forlemu presented a paper entitled “Efficiency
and Equity Trade-offs: What Role for
Development Partners”. The paper
delineated roles played by development
partners in balancing efficiency against
equity in the pro-poor regulation of
infrastructure in Africa. After tracing
the trends in infrastructure management
in Africa, assessing the clashing arguments
for efficiency and equity in the provision
of infrastructure regulation, presenting
the public-private partnership paradigm,
and analysing the role of development
partners in a changing global context,
Dr. Forlemu concluded that “balancing
efficiency and equity will always involve
costs and benefits, and the key point
for development partners and their
stakeholders in Africa is to remain
aware that change and adaptation are
in the DNA of development cooperation.”
AFUR is regarded as a key building
block in the efforts of the African
Union and its socio-economic programme,
the New Partnership for Africa’s
Development (NEPAD), in the integration
and rebirth of Africa. AFUR’s
vision and objectives are derived from
Clause 110 of the NEPAD Framework Document,
which recognizes the establishment
of AFUR and regional regulatory associations.
|